• (+254) 701248134
  • (+254) 752804812
  • rkoadvocatesllp@gmail.com
RKO logo FINALRKO logo FINALRKO logo FINALRKO logo FINAL
  • Home
  • About us
    • Our Firm
    • Our Team
    • Our Values and Promise
    • Our Mission and Commitment
    • Our Field of Expertise
  • Services
    • Group Action Litigation (Class Action)
    • Corporate and Commercial
      • Business Immigration
    • Real Estate and Conveyancing
    • Dispute Resolution and Litigation
  • News & Events
  • Cases
    • Mau Mau Litigation Case
    • Solai Dam Litigation Case
    • Tea Workers Litigation Case
  • Contact us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Home
  • About us
    • Our Firm
    • Our Team
    • Our Values and Promise
    • Our Mission and Commitment
    • Our Field of Expertise
  • Services
    • Group Action Litigation (Class Action)
    • Corporate and Commercial
    • Real Estate and Conveyancing
    • Dispute Resolution and Litigation
  • News & Events
  • Cases
    • Mau Mau Litigation Case
    • Solai Dam Litigation Case
    • Tea Workers Litigation Case
  • Contact us
  • Privacy Policy
✕
Finlays bid to derail ongoing UK proceedings, files suit against 1,044 poor tea workers in a Kenyan court
August 2, 2022
lordbraid

UK court orders tea giant James Finlay to withdraw Kenya case

A judge in Scotland has ordered James Finlay company to stop a case it filed in a Kenyan court to block another suit in the United Kingdom.


The judge, Lord Braid, on Monday ruled that the company that owns thousands of acres of tea bushes in Kericho County stops the proceedings
in the Employment and Labour Relation Court in Nairobi to allow a case filed by some 1,044 former and current employees in Scotland to continue.

Read more
Tea Case 020822 Finlay’s Poster

In the court of session proceedings held via a video link, Lord Braid acknowledged that the lawyers representing the workers had put forward a “strong prima facie case” that the action taken by James Finlay in Kenya
was “vexatious and oppressive.” The workers have sued the company in the Scotland Supreme Civil Court
for damages, claiming they suffered injuries while working for the company’s tea estates in Kericho County.

On August 6, the Nairobi court issued the company with temporary orders to stop the workers from pursuing the case in Scotland. The company wanted the matter to be pursued through the Kenyan courts citing the local court’s jurisdiction. In its filings at the Nairobi court, the company’s Managing Director Simon Hutchinson stated that the terms and conditions of service for the workers as unionisable employees are governed by the Constitution of Kenya.

Labour statutes

“I am aware that the respondents’ terms and condition of service was and is further governed by the labour statutes enacted pursuant to Article 94 of the Constitution,” the affidavit reads. In their petition through Andrew Smith, the Queen Counsel representing them in Scotland, claim the move by James Finlay was meant to prevent the UK suit from progressing and therefore frustrate the case.

“We also believe that James Finlay prefers to defer the matter back to the Kenyan courts, which are known to be corrupt and ineffective in most cases, as they believed they would get a favorable outcome after facing a series of defeats already in Scotland.” The lawyer noted. Mr. Smith pointed out that the conduct of the company, by seeking and obtaining the orders in Kenya which they have, was not only unconscionable but an abuse of the process of the Scottish Court; contemptuous of the Scottish proceedings; vexations; oppressive of
the group members; and calculated to harass and oppress them to defeat the ends of justice.”

He further noted that the conduct was a breach of the undertaking given to the court by them and the petitioners (tea workers).

“Specifically, we now reserve the right to seek findings of contempt of court against James Finlay and their Directors. However, the conduct complained of in the petition goes far beyond that contempt,” the lawyer said.

In his ruling, Lord Braid said the group proceedings could not continue for so long as the Kenyan ant-suit injunction remains in place. “That in itself will cause prejudice to the group members. To quote the often used phrase, justice delayed is justice denied.”

By Steve Mkawale | The Standard Newspaper

 

Share
0
RKO Advocates LLP
RKO Advocates LLP

Related posts

August 2, 2022

Finlays bid to derail ongoing UK proceedings, files suit against 1,044 poor tea workers in a Kenyan court


Read more
July 17, 2022

Kenyan Tea Workers obtain court’s protection in Scotland against threats, intimidation, and destruction of medical and employment records by James Finlay (Kenya) Ltd.


Read more
February 17, 2022

Kenya Tea Workers case brewing in Scotland as Judge confirms group proceedings against James Finlay Tea.


Read more

Quick links

Home

About us

Services

News & Events

Projects

Contact us

Our offices

RKO Advocates LLP

Lena Moi Road / Former Maragoli Road
Milimani Estate 300 Meters from
The Governor’s Residence
P.O. BOX 16303-20100
Nakuru – Kenya
Office Tel – (+254) 701248134
Office Tel – (+254) 752804812

Correspondence Address:

C/O
A.I Onyango & Company Advocates
Maendeleo House
2nd Floor,  Suite 15
Monrovia /Loita Street Junction
Nairobi – Kenya

Email: enquiries@rkoadvocates.com
Website:
www.rkoadvocates.com

Make an enquiry






    © 2023 RKO Advocates LLP. All Rights Reserved.
    Manage Cookie Consent
    To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
    Functional Always active
    The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
    Preferences
    The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
    Statistics
    The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
    Marketing
    The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
    Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
    View preferences
    {title} {title} {title}